Artificial intelligence has become a common resource for students writing college essays. It is fast, accessible, and capable of generating polished suggestions based on patterns found across the internet. Many students (and even some teachers) turn to it for topic ideas, structure, feedback, or outright drafting help. While the technology can be useful for certain mechanical tasks, relying on it for core essay guidance creates a real problem for students who want their applications to stand out.
AI systems generate responses by analyzing and remixing existing content. They surface the most common advice, the most frequently discussed structures, and the types of stories that already appear widely online. When thousands of students ask the same tools for help, the results tend to converge. Essays begin to share similar openings, similar reflections, similar “lessons learned,” and similar tones. Admissions officers already see large numbers of essays that follow familiar patterns. Advice drawn primarily from what is already circulating makes it harder, not easier, for an individual student to sound different.
The issue becomes more complicated when teachers use AI to evaluate college admissions essays. Most English teachers are skilled at assessing academic writing, literary analysis, and classroom assignments. They do not, however, regularly meet with admissions officers, visit colleges, or track what actually resonates in admissions reading. When they turn to AI for grading or feedback on college essays, they are often outsourcing judgment to a system trained on the same public advice and examples that students are already using. The result can be feedback that rewards safe, conventional approaches and undervalues more distinctive storytelling. An essay that feels fresh or personally revealing may receive criticism simply because it does not match the patterns the AI has learned from widely available sources.
This combination—students seeking AI-generated advice and teachers using AI to assess the results—tends to push essays toward the middle. It favors clarity, correctness, and familiarity over the specific details, unexpected angles, and authentic voice that help an application feel memorable. Students who want their essays to rise above the volume of similar submissions are better served by guidance that is not limited to what is already publicly available.
College counselors who work directly with admissions officers and review outcomes across a wide range of schools bring a different kind of perspective. They can help students identify the particular stories and qualities that set them apart rather than steering them toward broadly recommended formulas. The goal is not to avoid technology entirely; AI can still assist with proofreading or generating initial brainstorm lists. The risk lies in treating it as an authority on what will make an essay distinctive.
When the majority of applicants are drawing from the same pool of online suggestions and automated feedback, essays that sound different become more valuable, not less. Students who prioritize standing out usually benefit from working with people who understand both the individual student and the current admissions landscape, rather than relying primarily on tools that synthesize what is already out there.
Discover more from South Shore College Consulting & Tutoring
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
